A Mind-boggling travesty of justice: SCOTUS Further Enshrines Police State

police grope‘Liberty Groped by Police’ by Anthony Freda

(Sorry it’s all copy paste.  I dunno why I hadn’t seen this outrage earlier, but I’ve been putting a new police state post together, partially in preparation for this morning’s ruling from the bench in the trial of Caesar Goodson, who’d faced the most serious charges in the nickel-ride murder of Freddie Gray.)

 ‘The Supreme Court Just Ruled In Favor Of The Police State, And Sonia Sotomayor Is Not Having It; She lashed out at “lawless police conduct” that disproportionately targets black and brown Americans’ via HuffPo

“WASHINGTON — In a powerful dissent to a Supreme Court ruling that took an expansive view of the limits the Constitution places on police misconduct, Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Monday seemed to address the people most affected by unfortunate encounters with the police — black and brown Americans.

“Do not be soothed by the opinion’s technical language: This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants—even if you are doing nothing wrong,” Sotomayor wrote in the opening paragraph of her response to Utah v. Strieff, which the court decided in a 5-3 vote.

The case had asked the justices to decide whether evidence uncovered during an unlawful police stop could be used against the person in possession of it — a question that requires an interpretation of the Fourth Amendment‘s prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures.

“In his search for lawbreaking, the officer in this case himself broke the law.”’

Mark Stern at Slate: ‘Read Sonia Sotomayor’s Atomic Bomb of a Dissent Slamming Racial Profiling and Mass Imprisonment’

“The Department of Justice, Sotomayor writes, “recently reported that in the town of Ferguson, Missouri, with a population of 21,000, 16,000 people had outstanding warrants against them.” That means 76 percent of Ferguson residents have, under the court’s decision, effectively surrendered their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure. “In the St. Louis metropolitan area,” moreover, “officers ‘routinely’ stop people—on the street, at bus stops, or even in court—for no reason other than ‘an officer’s desire to check whether the subject had a municipal arrest warrant pending.’ ”

(Writing only for herself, not the minority):

“This Court has given officers an array of instruments to probe and examine you. When we condone officers’ use of these devices without adequate cause, we give them reason to target pedestrians in an arbitrary manner. We also risk treating members of our communities as second-class citizens. Although many Americans have been stopped for speeding or jaywalking, few may realize how degrading a stop can be when the officer is looking for more.

The indignity of the stop is not limited to an officer telling you that you look like a criminal. … If the officer thinks you might be dangerous, he may then “frisk” you for weapons. This involves more than just a pat down. As onlookers pass by, the officer may “feel with sensitive fingers every portion of [your] body. A thorough search [may] be made of [your] arms and armpits, waistline and back, the groin and area about the testicles, and entire surface of the legs down to the feet.”

The officer’s control over you does not end with the stop. If the officer chooses, he may handcuff you and take you to jail for doing nothing more than speeding, jaywalking, or “driving [your] pickup truck . . . with [your] 3-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter . . . without [your] seatbelt fastened.” At the jail, he can fingerprint you, swab DNA from the inside of your mouth, and force you to “shower with a delousing agent” while you “lift [your] tongue, hold out [your] arms, turn around, and lift [your] genitals.” Even if you are innocent, you will now join the 65 million Americans with an arrest record and experience the “civil death” of discrimination by employers, landlords, and whoever else conducts a background check. And, of course, if you fail to pay bail or appear for court, a judge will issue a warrant to render you “arrestable on sight” in the future.

By legitimizing the conduct that produces this double consciousness, this case tells everyone, white and black, guilty and innocent, that an officer can verify your legal status at any time. It says that your body is subject to invasion while courts excuse the violation of your rights. It implies that you are not a citizen of a democracy but the subject of a carceral state, just waiting to be cataloged.

We must not pretend that the countless people who are routinely targeted by police are “isolated.” They are the canaries in the coal mine whose deaths, civil and literal, warn us that no one can breathe in this atmosphere. They are the ones who recognize that unlawful police stops corrode all our civil liberties and threaten all our lives. Until their voices matter too, our justice system will continue to be anything but.”

injustice bill day

‘Injustice’ by Bill Day

3 responses to “A Mind-boggling travesty of justice: SCOTUS Further Enshrines Police State

  1. Trust yes, good morning to you. Off your specific post topic here, but trust is the key word again and again.

    A local citizen group in my home town is suing a nearby city (our county seat) over public trust shore frontage, land which the city was planning to sell at almost no cost to a private developer for a resort/hotel complex.

    Long history of broken trusts, beginning early in, “our,” nation’s history.

    WI established the earliest public trust doctrine on public ownership of all waters in the state, adopted by scores of other states and the model for federal legislation in the mid-1800s on. That’s the basis of our dissent with the city government attempts to ignore the doctrine.

    Also in our literal own backyard, environmental advocates fighting for decades to get action to protect groundwater (public trust again) from unregulated industrial liquid manure producers (CAFOs) poisoning it at will, with no DNR oversight, are finally getting a joint meeting with the EPA and the WI DNR tonight, and are seeking financial reparations and other funding and adequate regulation and enforcement mechanisms to protect public health and safety, that have been absolutely abandoned by the current state government legislative majority from the governor to the legislature to the AG to the WI Supreme court.
    Different authorities, much different enforcement issues but sadly where we are on so many fronts, including the one you brought here. Fighting the good fight, what other option do we have. (No question mark for a reason, there is no question, it is the imperative) Thanks ms wd.

    • i’m sorry, nonquixote; right now i just can’t drum up interest in this. too much rage over the facts in my current two diaries. also, if you ever find something you want to report on that’s way too off topic, you can always drop things in the most recent Open Menu. surely someone will see it. ;-) under recent comments, the first category is Open Menus.

      and i guess this evil scotus decision will stand for a long, long, time. dunno how the Rabble will fight it, really.

    • ooof, the Friends piece was from 2007; even they must have known how many treaties with first americans had been shredded by then. but our friend O did in fact settle the indian minerals trust account: for pennies on the dollar. no one, of course, will ever know where the money nor the books of that account went… and the oak flats robbery (mccain, et.al.) uranium mining at grand canyon, and the beat goes on w/ small temporary victories now and again.

      the other WI link is too long for me to read, and while i might sorta see why you equate that as a basis for bringing the lawsuit/s (and good on them), this the the fourth amendment to the constitution that just got gutted. as sotomayor noted: blacks and browns (and by extension, imo: any rabble) are the canaries in the coalmine.

      it sickened me to read some of the comments under articles covering this, like: “if you have no outstanding warrants, you’re okay” (only more snottily delivered). but look at the numbers she quoted in some locales, and many of those warrant are for crap like unpaid parking tickets. i’m just blown away, and by the fact that breyer voted with the majority.

      unsurprising that kagan, who’d helped gut miranda, didn’t want to subscribe to sotomayor’s outrage, isn’t it?

      best to all of you in the struggle, nonquixote. we can hope that one day the wheel will turn our way, and the planet’s way.

care to comment? (no registration required)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s