a bio-tech food & related products Roundup, so to speak

monsanto

‘EU approves Monsanto, Bayer genetically modified soybeans’, Reuters, July 22:

“The European Commission on Friday approved imports of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready 2 Xtend genetically modified soybean variety, after months of delays that had derailed the U.S. seed giant’s product launch this spring.

The decision now clears the way for widespread planting next season and removes a hurdle for North American farmers and grain traders, who have to keep close track of unapproved biotech traits that can disrupt trade. Top importer China approved the soybeans earlier this year.

U.S. grain trader and processor Archer Daniels Midland Co told Reuters on Friday its elevators and processing plants will now accept the Xtend soybean variety. Rivals Cargill Inc [CARG.UL], Bunge Ltd and CHS Inc, which had also refused to accept the variety without EU import approval, could not be immediately reached for comment.

The EU is the second largest importer of soybeans and its approval is not expected to have a major impact on merger talks by German suitor Bayer AG, whose sweetened $64-billion buyout offer of Monsanto was rejected last week, as it had been widely anticipated, analysts said on Friday.

“It would have been a big deal if it hadn’t been approved, but this was the expected outcome, although it took longer than anyone thought,” said Bernstein analyst Jonas Oxgaard.

Still, the approval marks a key victory for Monsanto in the wake of months of regulatory delays over this launch, and swirling controversy over whether glyphosate, the chemical in its popular Roundup herbicide, is carcinogenic.

Monsanto expects Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans, designed to tolerate applications of glyphosate and dicamba weed killers, to be planted on 15 million acres next spring and 55 million acres by 2019. The company is still waiting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to approve dicamba use on crops”  (again, more is here.)

From July 19 WSJ (behind a pay wall): “Monsanto Co. on Tuesday rejected a roughly $65 billion takeover proposal from Bayer AG, saying the improved bid continued to undervalue the biotech seed giant.

“Monsanto left the door open to further talks, however, and Bayer said it would continue to pursue the deal, despite objections from a major shareholder.”

Yes, I reckon that Monsanto’s coming bottom line sweetened the deal for Bayer.

Via ecowatchcom: ‘How the EPA Ignores the Dangers of Pesticide Cocktails’, it begins:

“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved nearly 100 pesticide products over the past six years that contain mixtures that make them more poisonous and increase the dangers to imperiled pollinators and rare plants, according to an investigation by the Center for Biological Diversity. These “synergistic” combinations have been widely overlooked by the EPA in its approval of pesticides for food, lawns and other uses.

The new report, ‘Toxic Concoctions: How the EPA Ignores the Dangers of Pesticide Cocktails’ pdf, involved an intensive search of patent applications for pesticide products containing two or more active ingredients recently approved by the EPA for four major agrochemical companies (Bayer, Dow, Monsanto and Syngenta).

“The EPA is supposed to be the cop on the beat, protecting people and the environment from the dangers of pesticides,” Nathan Donley, a scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity and author of the report, said. “With these synergistic pesticides, the EPA has decided to look the other way and guess who’s left paying the price?”

Synergy occurs when two or more chemicals interact to enhance their toxic effects. It can turn what would normally be considered a safe level of exposure into one that results in considerable harm. Pesticide mixtures are ubiquitous in the environment and also present in many products for sale on store shelves.”

Grim to read more on the EPA’s ‘see no evil’ practices.

From GMwarch.org: ‘Emails reveal role of Monsanto in Séralini study retraction Details’, 20 July 2016

Editor at the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology invited Monsanto scientists to review a study that found toxic effects from Monsanto products, reports French newspaper Le Monde

In September 2012 the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT) published the research of a team led by the French biologist Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini, which found liver and kidney toxicity and hormonal disturbances in rats fed Monsanto’s GM maize NK603 and very small doses of the Roundup herbicide it is grown with, over a long-term period. An additional observation was a trend of increased tumours in most treatment groups.
In November 2013 the study was retracted by the journal’s editor, A. Wallace Hayes, after the appointment of a former Monsanto scientist, Richard E. Goodman, to the editorial board and a non-transparent review process by nameless people that took several months.
Did Monsanto pressure the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT) to retract the study? French journalist Stéphane Foucart addresses this question in an article for Le Monde.
The article shows the total subordination of Goodman to Monsanto. It also reveals how Hayes played a double role in the retraction of the study, acting behind the scenes to encourage Monsanto scientists to join the reviewing panel that would feed their views into the decision to retract.

Influence of chemical companies on academics

Foucart examined emails disclosed as a result of a freedom of information request submitted by the food transparency organisation US Right to Know (USRTK). Foucart writes that the emails “reveal the influence of the chemical companies on some academics”.

You can read the rest, and the piece at Le Monde si vouz parlez Francais , then decide…  Early Guardian coverage of the study is here; a breath of fresh air, no less:

‘Study linking GM maize to cancer must be taken seriously by regulators; Trial suggesting a GM maize strain causes cancer has attracted a torrent of abuse, but it cannot be swept under the carpet’

I’d covered the study in 2012 for then, My.firedoglake; it’s long, but also has the report and hideous photos linked.

especially since:

Ooopsie; Patrick Bond at CP: ‘Bill Gates’ Silver-Bullet Misfiring at the Mandela Memorial Lecture’, July 18

“On July 17, Bill Gates delivered the annual Mandela Lecture in Johannesburg, justifying his philosophy of market-orieted, technology-centric philanthropy. Last year, French economist Thomas Piketty’s speech on inequality attracted healthy debate, with even business notables endorsing his concerns, given South Africa’s intense social conflict.” [snip] major inequality, angry, militant workers…and worse…  I’ll skip his initial, but thankfully brief, homage to the mega-billionaire Gates as too much to bear.  He rolls on, and good on him:

“But compare what can be termed Gates’ ‘philanthro-capitalism’ with Ford Foundation President Darren Walker’s proposal for a more appropriate approach to giving in the 21st century: “We foundations need to reject inherited, assumed, paternalist instincts… We need to interrogate the fundamental root causes of inequality, even, and especially, when it means that we ourselves will be implicated.”

In contrast, Gates specialises in top-down technicist quick-fixes – ‘silver bullets’ – which often backfire on the economic shooting range of extreme corporate influence and neoliberal policies. As Global Justice Now’s Polly Jones complained in a report last month, Gates’ “influence is so pervasive that many actors in international development, which would otherwise critique the policy and practice of the foundation, are unable to speak out independently as a result of its funding and patronage.”

Amongst the few exceptions are Katharyne Mitchell and Matthew Sparke, whose research critiques Gates’ “highly targeted investments, market-mediated partnerships, rapid technological fixes, constant assessment, quick exits, and the use of competition, benchmarking and rankings to set funding priorities.”

Bad examples can be drawn across the vast sphere of Gates Foundation activities:

* Gates’ power threatens African food in part due to his advocacy of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), which benefit agro-corporates such as Monsanto but wipe out local seeds. In Kenya, Gates’ people and US AID appear to have succeeded in reversing a GMO-seed ban (only four African states allow GMOs). The Gates-supported Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa “advised and lobbied the governments of Ghana, Tanzania, and Malawi, among others, to adopt pro-business seed and land policy reforms,” according to a critique by a progressive food-sovereignty NGO, Oakland Institute.

* To address species-threatening climate change, a rather confused Gates favours ‘Terrapower’ nuclear, a dangerous distraction from the urgent need to both expand renewable energy and radically reduce fossil-fuel abuse. As Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson bragged about Gates at his recent AGM, “there’s no space between he and I.” (sic)

* Privatised health and education are Gates’ speciality but in India, a Gates-funded trial on the genital cancer-causing disease Human papillomavirus was cancelled by the government because thousands of girls aged 10-14 were victims of ethics violations such as forged consent forms and lack of health insurance; seven died. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.”

He indicts Gates’ non-profit industrial complex further, including making sure his Merck brand of AIDS medicines were used in SA and Botwana, resulting in ‘at least 330,000 avoidable deaths’.  Bond also narrates how neoliberal South Africa has become since the ANC took power, especially under Madiba.

Bond ends:

“Gates has apparently not (yet) reached the stage of philanthro-seduction of radical social movements, trade unions, feminists, Black Lives Matter activists, LGBTI scene, environmentalists, Occupiers, anti-imperialists, youth and progressive political parties which do so much to withstand the inequality, state surveillance, racism and other features of contemporary economic tyranny.

These forces show, objectively, that the world urgently needs far less corporate power – including in the hands of Bill Gates and Microsoft – and many more bottom-up activist initiatives to achieve thorough-going wealth redistribution.”

Also, Colin Todhunter has warned much the same, but: ‘Toxic Wheat, GMOs and the Precautionary Principle’, by Raúl Ilargi Meijer, July 16

He’s reprised a post of his from two years ago, but with a new addition at the top:

“But first I would like to touch on a closely connected issue, which is Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s ‘war’ on GMOs. Taleb, of Black Swans fame, has been at it for a while, but he’s stepped up his efforts off late.

In 2014, with co-authors Rupert Read, Raphael Douady, Joseph Norman and Yaneer Bar-Yam, he published The Precautionary Principle (with Application to the Genetic Modification of Organisms), an attempt to look at GMOs through a ‘solidly scientific’ prism of probability and complex systems. From the abstract:

The precautionary principle (PP) states that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing severe harm to the public domain (affecting general health or the environment globally), the action should not be taken in the absence of scientific near-certainty about its safety. Under these conditions, the burden of proof about absence of harm falls on those proposing an action, not those opposing it. PP is intended to deal with uncertainty and risk in cases where the absence of evidence and the incompleteness of scientific knowledge carries profound implications and in the presence of risks of “black swans”, unforeseen and unforeseable events of extreme consequence.

[..] We believe that the PP should be evoked only in extreme situations: when the potential harm is systemic (rather than localized) and the consequences can involve total irreversible ruin, such as the extinction of human beings or all life on the planet. The aim of this paper is to place the concept of precaution within a formal statistical and risk-analysis structure, grounding it in probability theory and the properties of complex systems. Our aim is to allow decision makers to discern which circumstances require the use of the PP and in which cases evoking the PP is inappropriate.

This puts into perspective the claims made by Monsanto et al that since no harm has ever been proven to arise from the use of GMOs, they should therefore be considered safe. Which is the approach largely taken over by American politics, and increasingly also in Europe and other parts of the world. In their paper, Taleb et al say the approach does not meet proper scientific standards.”

………………………………………………………………………………………..
There must be some good news out there, but this is har-har funny, anyway: ‘Barack Obama’s half-brother Malik says he’s voting for Donald Trump; Malik Obama, who has the same father as the US president, said his frustrations with the Democratic party have lead him to support the Republican nominee’, the Guardian,  lol.

20 responses to “a bio-tech food & related products Roundup, so to speak

  1. “We believe that the PP should be evoked only in extreme situations…” i don’t understand that statement. we are in an extreme situation globally. shouldn’t *everything* we do & have done be viewed thru the PP at this stage? i mean, just why are all these bees dying again? & fish? and…

    and fuck europe. i suspect many of us knew that at some point europe would fold faster than superman on laundry day barring mass resistance. inevitable, really. local control of food cannot be allowed.

    • taleb, et.al. exact point was that the PP should be utilized as far as genetic modification of seeds, as they do pose a systemic risk to all of the world’s food supply. ilargi noted that their report coincided w/ his own beliefs that at least 100 years of actual study should precede okaying them. i was trying hard to find vandana shiva’s flip-out from the last (i’d thought) gmo post i’d put up about the theory that…well, i couldn’t find it, but i wonder if it didn’t have t do with intra-species dna and rna transfers. but i think we already know it’s so.

      but oh, my; the section on toxic wheat and the cause of what’s thought to be gluten sensitivity, while no modified wheat has been anything but field-tested (iirc), farmers dose it heavily with Roundup just ahead the harvest to dessicate it, causing more berries to release. presto: better harvest. one has to wonder, too, if the massive numbers of folks being diagnosed with any or all of those gluten and new food allergies and sensitivities…are down to all this hideous gene-splicing. ‘it’s not nice to fool mother nature’.

      yep, we’d been laughing at knowing that the EU would fold, yes? of course, the trans-genic soybeans will have to be grown elsewhere, of course. yanno, like the US? fuckers.and fuck bill gates again, while i’m at it.

      oh, and the burden should be on the industry to prove safety, but doggone it! industry shills just happen to be on a lot of those agencies; remember, O stacked the agencies like that? and made an EO to fast track unproven drugs? o, what a tangled corporate web they’ve woven…

  2. oh, bloody hell; speaking of fast-tracking drugs: this un’s a keeper. the exposé includes the blowback from gates’ merk hpv vacs in india, but also this: “There are plenty of examples of disease-mongering in the Indian scenario.

    Piracetam is promoted for vague conditions like “intellectual decay,” “social maladjustment,” “lack of alertness,” “changes of mood,” “deterioration in behaviour” and in “learning disabilities in children associated with the written word”.

    the author/s didn’t mention the invention of ‘restless leg syndrome’, however. ;-)

    • the criminality, petty & other, and the diseases of the populace are profit vectors. hell, not just the diseases, the basic bodily needs. and if we can create a cycle of disease manufacture thru the process of meeting bodily needs, damn. the saying “i will turn diseases to commodity,” is supposed to be a joke, not a blueprint. (from one of the bard’s Falstaff plays.)

      did you see the NYT article about how the world is getting shorter? this is a 50 yr trend so it involves more than gmo’s. no doubt gmo’s will fix it. why are people in cambodia, peru, tanzania, AND the US (avg height peaked in the late 90’s) et al getting shorter? of course any systemic answer mystifies the NYT & they treat it as kind of a tasteless joke. oh no! more homunculi!

      • that was quite a report, wasn’t it? ay yi yi; some of it, of course, as new to me and likely most USians. as in: india wtf?

        now that nyt must be funny, esp. given the amount of media hysteria over the north koreans shrinking, shrinking…due to kim jong il’s starvation of his people.

        • ray kurzweil says we have “outdated genes.” (oh and of course the world is getting better. never better, in fact. we just have better measurements of the awfulness. like global altitudinal shrinkage, i guess.) need to reprogram ’em, reboot. our genes come faded, pre-washed, pre-ripped, pre-tattered, pre-shrunk, designed for the tundra, the shtetl, and the grave, not the Neuromancer’s cyber/fiber glass Mcdonald’s playhouse of the future. hopefully the ragged-jeaned rabble survive just long enough to pull the plug on his Aryan cryo-tube.

          our genes, the genes of all the plants & animals & all, it’s just like turning on & off switches, right? right?!? let’s pretend that is.

          i’d forgotten about the n. koreans shrinking. well, w/HRC in office, they probably won’t be shrinking long.

          • kurzwell must be the times’ shrinkage’ author? please tell me he doesn’t give his prescription for the Great Genes Reboot?

            • no he is not. yes he does. emphatic prescription. never has prescription been more prescribed.

              • well, yes, i found him. “Why machines won’t displace humans: We’re going to merge with them, we’re going to make ourselves smarter. We’re already doing that. These mobile devices make us smarter. We’re routinely doing things we couldn’t possibly do without these brain extenders.”

                too bad ‘smart’ doesn’t equal ‘wise’. oh, and tech will transform sex, as well. kewl.

                • cyber-gnosticism. underneath this brave new technogeek vision is a profound hatred of the body & materiality itself, the limitations of the body. Kurzweil thinks he can play this card game w/his finitude, his own materiality. the future he believes in is just as fantastical as anybody else’s after life, but w/more computers & sexbots. what if his future for society is realized, but that society decides he’s too big a prick to unfreeze & reanimate? or they just forgot? wouldn’t that be some juicy irony?

                  very obvious these cyber-topia fantasies have nothing to do w/the way science & technology actually work in this world. neither is cyber-topia the first thing that comes to mind thinking of what that science & tech will bring us to shortly. more like Death Valley meets Noah’s Flood everywhere. camels might be a better investment than Apple. real soon. sorry, no water to spare for rich morons cryo-sleep tubes.

                  As they elide what’s happening to the earth, these fantasies efface the poor just as the “scientific” global economy does. disdain for the rivers & air is the same thing as disdain for the rabble or nature’s highly-evolved DNA. high-stakes gambling w/the planet’s future as if nature was the Fortune 400’s whore.

                  why do lawyers get paid more than farmers? b/c the economy is intentionally structured to give shit to the rude mechanicals who make up the bottom 85% of the gen pop. the economy is depraved indifference to the body of humanity just as it is to mother earth.

                  and what do they win, kurzweil, if they win the gamble? to be plugged into the hive mind, to have Google apps in your brain??? uh……yeah, cyber-gnostics.

                  • wonderful rant, jason. wanna bet the archdruid has read the wurlitzer man? but mr. wd just got home w/ groceries to stow away, and we’re jamming to get ready for our daughter’s family of 5, due to arrive early tonight. be back as i can, pant pant. ;-)

                  • this is what keeps making me laugh: ‘what if his future for society is realized, but that society decides he’s too big a prick to unfreeze & reanimate? or they just forgot? wouldn’t that be some juicy irony?’

                    touché! and ‘cyber-gnostics’, as well.

  3. wild fun, a lotta work, a seven-ring-corral-rodeo to wrangle. should i put up an open menu thread? i have a couple things i’d hoped to post, but not today, even though the li’l and large cowboys n cowgirls are due to be at the mancos days festivities for a lotta the day today.

    speaking of wild wet, a neighbor called to give us the fuzziest of stories about two neighbors arguing over the water that flows across our land, and one shot at the other, sheriff came, dunno if the shooter was arrested. good times. but that the asshole is packing bother the crap outta me.

  4. in honor of the two enviro-pieces up on counterpunch today, Aug 15, which made we want to pull my friggin teeth out:
    GM Hopkins
    Binsey Poplars
    (felled 1879)
    MY aspens dear, whose airy cages quelled,
    Quelled or quenched in leaves the leaping sun,
    All felled, felled, are all felled;
    Of a fresh and following folded rank
    Not spared, not one
    That dandled a sandalled
    Shadow that swam or sank
    On meadow and river and wind-wandering weed-winding bank.

    O if we but knew what we do
    When we delve or hew—
    Hack and rack the growing green!
    Since country is so tender
    To touch, her being só slender,
    That, like this sleek and seeing ball
    But a prick will make no eye at all,
    Where we, even where we mean
    To mend her we end her,
    When we hew or delve:
    After-comers cannot guess the beauty been.
    Ten or twelve, only ten or twelve
    Strokes of havoc únselve
    The sweet especial scene,
    Rural scene, a rural scene,
    Sweet especial rural scene.

    • that made tears well in mine eyes, jason. and written 130+ years ago. i went and read the two essays; i hear your furor. thank you. the single monarch mirrors what’s afoot here now, although last year, i got photos of three, and several beautiful swallowtails. and at least some of the bees have returned, although some are new species i can’t even name.

      Rural scene, a rural scene,
      Sweet especial rural scene.

      on edit: i can’t even bear to read this interview at TRNN on the new report from the NOAA.

  5. a prick has made no eye at all. (here’s another http://www.bartleby.com/122/33.html)

    Sharmini Peries at the very end of TRNN: *Setting aside all the wars underway* [KABOOM!], this is the greatest threat that humanity faces today, so I hope what you’re saying in terms of communities and people getting together and *pressuring their governments* [snooooooze] into action actually takes place.

    what’s the relation b/n all the guns out there & “pressuring the gov’t’? ferguson, baltimore, milwaukee all try “pressuring the gov’t,” don’t they? and the DOD now recognizes climate change! whoohoo! one more threat we’ll need intensive support for which only DOD can provide!

    yeah, the news isn’t good, but just one quote, not the worst but typical:
    “When Obama came to office in 2008, the amount of oil that was produced by the United States was 5 million barrels per day. It declined for a long time. Now, as of last year, the U.S. had almost doubled that production of oil to 9.5 million barrels per day.” look at that wildcatter obama go! he’s more oil than geedub & vice.

    i may have posted this here before; really just a massive strike:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secessio_plebis
    sounds like a good plan of action.

    • hopkins’ poem i’d thought scottish, but no, english/irish. such a sad and tragic life (teh wiki), bless his depressed heart.

      but i’m not getting the trnn quote; i’m sorry. i’d have thought perez knew how huuuuuge the military carbon footprint is. and ach, i didn’t look at your last link. tomorrow? (wd asked hopefully)

      • no worries. despite all the fracking stuff, i did not know that domestic oil production had nearly doubled under obie the wildcat. they also talk about sea level rise, etc., etc., more global fun stuff than the local symptom of more oil pumpin in the US.

        that link at wiki is to some scenes in archaic Roman history when the plebs, the masses, just got up & split from the city of Rome. a bit of history to be resuscitated.

        • argh; that’s what the greenpeace man recommended? ah, well, more gate-keeping, a la bill mcKibben. let’s have a march at cop21! we’ll get our sponsors to fly shitloads of induns over to gay paree, let them lead the march!

          oy, on the secessio plebis: talk about ‘be the grit to stop the machine’ or however it goes. thanks for the ‘no worries’; i dunno how i get so behind.

care to comment? (no registration required)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s