Updates on J. Assange ahead of his Feb 24 Extradition Hearing

Phase one will last a week, according to District Judge Vanessa Baraitser; phase two will commence in May and take up to three weeks..

‘First they came for Julian, next for you’: Waters, Westwood join massive London rally against Assange extradition (photos and video)’, RT.com, Feb. 22, 2020
“Thousands have protested near the British Parliament against WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange’s looming extradition to the US ahead of the hearing next week.

Demonstrators marched from Australia House to Parliament Square near the Palace of Westminster, where both houses of Parliament are located.”

Reporters without Borders are asking us to sign their petition against Julian Assange’s extradition to the United Sates.

‘European legal team will seek asylum for Julian Assange in France’, Alex Lantier,  22 February 2020, wsws.org

“Members of imprisoned WikiLeaks journalist Julian Assange’s legal team held a press conference, together with Assange’s father John Shipton, on Thursday in Paris. They announced that they will seek asylum in France for Assange, the publisher of WikiLeaks who has been relentlessly hounded by Washington and the European powers for nearly a decade and is currently held in Belmarsh prison near London.

They will also challenge his threatened extradition to the United States by launching a suit before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg. This strategy is viable despite Brexit, as the ECHR is attached not to the European Union but to the Council of Europe, of which Britain remains a member.” [snip]

“Speakers at the conference included defense attorney Éric Dupond-Moretti; Spanish investigative magistrate Baltasar Garzón, who is leading Assange’s European legal team; Dupond-Moretti’s associate Antoine Vey; John Shipton; and representatives of the Reporters without Borders (RSF) association that hosted the event.” [snip]

“This illegitimate and shocking persecution of a individual for publishing vital information opens the way for Assange to receive asylum in France, Dupond-Moretti said: “We are of course working on the possibility of requesting political asylum from the French authorities. Our constitution permits it. … Article 53 of our Constitution allows France to serve as a refuge to any person who is threatened for defending freedom of expression.”

Dupond-Moretti also pointed to Assange’s extensive personal ties to France—where WikiLeaks was first incorporated, where many of its servers reside, and where his partner and youngest child live.

“We will ask to meet the president of France in the coming days, in fact in the coming hours” over this asylum request, Dupond-Moretti stated.

Dupont-Moretti and Vey also explained that they are working to formulate a new legal basis for bringing Assange’s case before the EHCR, which has previously ruled that it could not examine Assange’s case as it lacked jurisdiction due to a technicality. [snip]

“Baltasar Garzón—well known for his role in trying to prosecute Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in Spain, and in investigating the crimes of the Spanish fascist regime covered by the illegitimate 1977 Amnesty Law—pointed to the rampant criminality of the US-led prosecution of Assange.

He said, “The very same people pursuing him as a delinquent are those who have committed crimes in order to pursue him. … A very grave injustice is being committed, which can affect the entire community of independent media, as well as freedom of expression. It is an attempt to silence all those who are critical of the state.” [snip]

“Spanish courts are already investigating Spanish security firm Undercover Global, that gave the CIA audio and video of Assange and his meetings with his lawyers and supporters at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Garzón said this investigation could provide proof to UK courts “that the trial of Assange is a political trial by the United States, aiming to prevent the exposure by Mr Assange of criminal behavior by US state agencies.”

Garzón added, “Currently we are doing detailed work to study materials … showing a systematic violation of Julian Assange’s rights, given that all Assange’s documents for his trial were taken from him by Ecuadorian President Lenín Moreno. Moreno gave this documentation to the United States at their request. This documentation should not be held by the US government but by Mr Assange.”

New conflict of interest evidence against UK judge in charge of Assange extradition process’, Kevin Reed, 22 February 2020, wsws.org

Lord and Lady Arbuthnot

“Information has come to light demonstrating that the chief magistrate overseeing the extradition proceedings against Julian Assange received financial benefits from organizations with close ties to the UK Foreign Office prior to her appointment.

According to a report on Friday in the South African-based Daily Maverick, Lady Emma Arbuthnot attended, along with her husband Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, all-expenses-paid secretive gatherings of the organizations Tertulias and Tatlidil in 2014 that included numerous UK foreign policy officials. Lady Arbuthnot was appointed chief magistrate in Westminster in October 2016.

Although as of November 2019 Arbuthnot is no longer formally presiding over the Assange extradition proceedings, she has refused to recuse herself and remains in a supervisory role overseeing the trial with her subordinate District Judge Vanessa Baraitser on the bench. According to the UK court rules, the chief magistrate is “responsible for … supporting and guiding district judge colleagues.”

The Daily Maverick report states: “Tertulias, an annual forum held for political and corporate leaders in the UK and Spain, is regarded by the UK Foreign Office as one of its ‘partnerships’.” In attendance at the Tertulias conference in Bilbao, Spain in October 2014 was Conservative Party member Liz Truss, who is now UK Trade Secretary. The report says, “Liz Truss, then Justice Secretary, ‘advised’ the Queen to appoint Lady Arbuthnot in October 2016.”

The expenses of Lady Arbuthnot at the Bilbao conference were covered by the Tertulias organization, since her husband, “a former Conservative defense minister with extensive links to the British military and intelligence community exposed by WikiLeaks,” was the chairman of the organization.

Lady Arbuthnot was also present with her husband at the British-Turkish Tatlidil Forum in Istanbul in November 2014. Daily Maverick describes Tatlidil (Turkish for “sweet talk”) as “a forum established by the UK and Turkish governments for ‘high level’ individuals involved in politics and business.” Those present included Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

Sultan Edogan

“The report states that the UK delegation to the Tatlidil forum in Istanbul, “was led by Prince Andrew, who also hosted the Tatlidil in Edinburgh the previous year. Then foreign minister Tobias Ellwood spoke at the forum while former foreign secretary Jack Straw, who is a co-chair of Tatlidil, presided over one of the discussions. Erdoğan spoke at the meeting and reportedly called for the removal of Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.” [snip]

“The very same people from the UK Foreign Office with whom Chief Magistrate Arbuthnot had been hobnobbing before her appointment have made the most vociferous denunciations of Assange, calling him “a miserable little worm.” They refused to recognize his right to asylum in Ecuador, leaving him trapped inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for seven years before British police dragged him out and arrested him last April.” [snip]

“Last year, when the fact that her husband was a leading figure of British foreign policy was originally brought to light as a violation of the “Guide to Judicial Conduct” in England and Wales, Arbuthnot ignored calls for her recusal. Yet the activities of Lord Arbuthnot and his associates at the defense contractor Thales and British intelligence were the subject of thousands of WikiLeaks exposures, making the conflict of interest that much more obvious.

The role of the Arbuthnots in the persecution and imprisonment of Assange, and his extradition trial that is set to begin on Monday, is a critical indicator of the high-level conspiracy by powerful individuals in the British government, in cooperation with Washington DC, to punish and destroy the WikiLeaks founder.”

Qui male agit odit lucem.  (The one who commits evil shuns the light.)

(cross-posted at caucus99percent.com)

5 responses to “Updates on J. Assange ahead of his Feb 24 Extradition Hearing

  1. https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu/2020/02/23/we-are-here-so-that-unarmed-truth-has-the-final-word-speech-at-julian-assange-london-rally-22-2-2020/?fbclid=IwAR3H4kuJh4UVCVIs-rio2tI5jy6Mi2FE0UD2Eec6vBBHkCv-sl2va_weBS8 Varoufakis mentions the simultaneous demonstration in support of Julian that took place in Athens. But there was no-one from Varoufakis’ organization DiEM25 (or any of the other two groups supporting the Athens demonstration) to give at the small demonstration in Athens a speech comparable to the speech that Yanis Varoufakis gave in London. Nobody spoke at the Athens demonstration. It seems that this is the best DiEM25’s “pan-European movement” can do for the moment.

  2. you like yanis, don’t you? i’ve long forgotten the many reasons i don’t, but i
    was about to say he Thinks he’ll get into see julian’. i’d hope that hi attorneys would get preference for the limited visitations he’s allowed out of solitary.

    but i did just go to the DontExtraditeAssange twit account, and found he’s with john shipman, so…maybe they’ll get to see him.

    and yes, i remember his alliance with bernie sanders…
    https://neoskosmos.com/en/123340/yanis-varoufakis-and-bernie-sanders-announce-alliance/

    thanks, wayne.

  3. I like the idea of the citizens’ movement he originally proposed, and I suggested starting it from where we both were rather than from Berlin. He has not done anything the way I think it should have been done, and now there is the added complication of Brexit, where again he has done the opposite of what I think would be best. It is not a question of whether I like him but of whether he likes me, which he doesn’t. But perhaps antipathy is a step up from mutual ignorance.

    • i stand corrected, and apologize for my incorrect memory. but now you’ve corrected it, i vaguely remember showing you something not long ago that was quite telling and unsavory he’d done or said, and again (iirc), you said you’d post it on social media.

      his ego is epic, but what one thing i’m trying to remember was an economics panel he’d been on with an uber-capitalist, and even he’d thought he’d be economically censured for what he’d done. anyway, a friend and i used to call him ‘varouFAKEis’. let me hop on my harley in my cool leathers and rayans…and zoom away.

      • anyway, varoufakis and his ‘apathty! man in the iron mask!’ rant is totally beside the point, so i’m done. as i’d said over yonder at c99%,

        ‘i’m so despondent i can’t parse the (few) comments, much less respond to them.

        tomorrow’s hearing will be at Woolwich Crown Court will cover arguments that the extradition is politically motivated and an abuse of process.
        it’s the court that tries terrorists, and is connected to belmarsh gitmo via tunnel. the WC court has 12 different courtrooms, and while i’ve of course forgotten how few ‘public seats’ judge vanessa baraitser mentioned would be available, i wonder which of julian’s allied journalists will even get in to report what exactly happens tomorrow.

        i know the SEP (wsws) will have someone there (as they did for alleged CIA leaker joshua schulte), and kevin gosztola (shadowproof) said he’ll be there hoping to get in (he’d also covered chelsea manning’s tribunal back in the day for firedooglake). craig murray will no doubt be there hoping to get into the room to report if he’s well enough…

        but i’m imagining a preponderance of ‘accredited journalists’ being permitted to cover the story: reuters for the NY/CIA times, fucking luke harding for the guardian, and so on.

        i guess we may find out soon. i guess the one bright spot is that baraitser did at least kinda/sorta hear julian’s attorneys’ complaints that they had so little time to prepare…she’d divided the hearing into two. and of course, given that the US prosecutor was given all assange’s electronic devices and notes…and all meetings with jen robinson and others was recorded…ah, well, you’ll likely get the gist of the reasons my heart is heavy.’

Leave a Reply to wendyedavis Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s